Article

jdsupra.com on 2019-07-31 23:07

California Supreme Court Confirms that the “anti-SLAPP” Statute Applies to Claims of Discrimination and Retaliation

Prior to the California Supreme Court’s decision in Wilson vs. Cable News Network, Inc., California Courts of Appeal were split on whether ...

Related news

The Anti-SLAPP Evolution Continues: California Supreme Court Confirms Anti-SLAPP Protection Can Apply to Retaliation and Discrimination Claims jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Federal Judge Confirms that Federal Trade Secret Statute Applies to Misappropriation that Occurs Overseas jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Court Confirms Louisiana Anti-Discrimination Statute, Not Tort Law, Provides the Exclusive Basis for Employment Discrimination Claim jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland , Louisiana
California Supreme Court Decides Wilson v. CNN: Court Rules No Categorical Exception to Anti-SLAPP Review for Discrimination and Retaliation Claims and Provides Encouragement for the Continued Use of Anti-SLAPP Motions in the Peer Review Context jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
California’s Anti-SLAPP Statute Untangled jdsupra.com
California
The 12 Days of California Labor & Employment Series – Day 2: Longer Statute of Limitations for Harassment, Discrimination, and Retaliation Claims was not on Employers' Holiday Wish List jdsupra.com
United States , Switzerland , California
What retaliation standard applies to employers?jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Anti-SLAPP Statute Can’t Be Used Against Subpoena jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
California Court of Appeal Confirms McDonnell-Douglas Burden Shifting Applies to Section 1278.5 Whistleblower Retaliation Claims jdsupra.com
California
D.C. Circuit Weighs in on the FCA’s Anti-Retaliation Statute jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Superior Court Opinion Shows Why We Need a Federal anti-SLAPP Statute jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Fourth DC federal district judge rules anti-SLAPP statute cannot be used in federal court jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Arizona’s Paid Time Off Statute Applies to the Coronavirus jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland , Arizona
Third DC District Court Judge Reaffirms that DC anti-SLAPP Statute Inapplicable In Federal Court jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Anti-Slapp Statute Does Not Apply To Allegations That Insurer Improperly Refused To Provide Cumis Counsel jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Federal Court Applies Nevada’s Interest Statute in FDCPA Case jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
California Appeals Court Confirms Constitutionality of Piece-Rate Compensation Statute jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
EEOC Sues Imperial Pacific for Sex Discrimination, Harassment and Retaliation jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Lockheed Martin Sued by EEOC For Disability Discrimination And Retaliation jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
9th Circuit Applies 6-year Statute of Limitations to TILA Rescission Claims jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland