Article

jdsupra.com on 2020-04-17 07:40

D.C. High Court Holds that Businesses Do Not Face Strict Liability for Junk Faxes Advertising Their Products, Agency Principles Apply

In a recent TCPA junk-fax case, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals drew the intuitive conclusion that businesses do not incur TCPA liability ...

Related news

Liability Insurance Coverage: Basic Principles jdsupra.com
California
Taking The "Strict" Out Of Treasurer Liability jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Blog: PhRMA Releases Updated Guiding Principles on DTC Advertising jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland , Guiding
Oregon Court Imposes Strict Liability for Missed Meal Breaks jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
$375.00 a Class Member to Settle? Court Approves Whopper of a TCPA Settlement Against Allstate Insurance Company over Junk Faxes jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland , The Settlement
Another TCPA Nightmare: CEO of Medical Supply Company Faces Crippling Personal Liability for Faxes Company Sent he Thought Were Legal jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
New Bill Would Loosen Virginia’s Strict Happy Hour Advertising Rules jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Strict Liability for Lack of Informed Consent in Clinical Trials jdsupra.com
Brookwood , Houston , Chicago , Ohio , Cleveland Clinic
Strict Liability in FedEx's Appeal: Implications for Export Controls jdsupra.com
China , United Arab Emirates , Syria , The Settlement , United States
Strict Liability Energy: IPO Litigation and Risk Management jdsupra.com
United States
Amazon Subject to Strict Products Liability in California jdsupra.com
China , Oakland , California
Behind the Faxes: Sixth Circuit Holds That Plaintiff in TCPA Junk Fax Class Action Adequately Pled That Informational Fax Violated TCPA Because it was a “Pretext” For Solicitation jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Proposed Change to Sexual Harassment Law Would Impose Strict Liability on Employers jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Relocating financial services operations due to Brexit? - What you need to know about the EU’s strict “Supervisory Principles on Relocations”jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Fine Print May Not Be Enough to Avoid False Advertising Liability jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
California Appeals Court Rules Industry Custom & Practice May Be Admissible in Strict Products Liability Cases jdsupra.com
California
Is it the Dawning of the Age of Strict Products Liability for Contractors in California?jdsupra.com
Irvine , California
Loomis v. Amazon: Strict Products Liability in the World of E-Commerce jdsupra.com
California
Ninth Circuit empowers FDA’s misbranded drug criminal enforcement efforts - companies face strict liability jdsupra.com
United States
Sixth Circuit Rejects Strict Liability for Products Advertised via Fax, “Some Level of Knowledge” Required jdsupra.com
Eastpointe , Switzerland