Newstral
Article
San Jose Mercury News on 2020-10-06 07:10
Editorial: Oakland voters should reject premature school bond measure
Related news
- Voters reject soccer stadium bondabqjournal.com
- Tucson voters overwhelmingly reject sanctuary city measureFox News
- Oakland loses Measure AA lawsuit, judge calls it a ‘fraud on voters’San Jose Mercury News
- Voters reject Los Altos bond measuremv-voice.com
- Pacific Grove voters reject Measure P, elect two new faces.montereycountyweekly.com
- Tucson voters on course to reject sanctuary city measureMerced Sun-Star
- Editorial: Why Santa Clara voters should reject Measure ASan Jose Mercury News
- Pacific Grove voters reject Measure P, elect two new councilmembers.montereycountyweekly.com
- Editorial: Berkeley voters should reject costly, ill-conceived Measure LSan Jose Mercury News
- Voters Appear to Approve BART $3.5 Billion Bond MeasureNBC Bay Area
- Editorial: Stop trying to hide bond measure taxes from votersSan Jose Mercury News
- Reject Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf’s Election Pickspostnewsgroup.com
- Tulare hospital district voters soundly reject bond measureThe Fresno Bee
- Oakland won’t collect Measure AA parcel tax this yeareastbaytimes.com
- SLO voters reject ‘nondiscrimination in housing’ ballot measure, early returns showsanluisobispo.com
- Oakland ballot measure asks voters to extend library parcel tax 30 more yearsSan Jose Mercury News
- Oakland voters approve civilian police commissionsmdailyjournal.com