DeutschNewstral
Article
jdsupra.com on 2020-12-24 01:01
The Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Appeal on Defendants’ Ability to Rebut the Basic Presumption of Reliance at Class Certification
Related news
- Seventh Circuit Vacates Decision To Certify Class, Holding That District Court Must Consider Sufficiency Of Defendants' Evidence To Rebut Fraud-On-The-Market Presumption Of Reliance, As Required Under Halliburton IIjdsupra.com
- Southern District Of New York Rules That Defendant Failed To Rebut Basic Presumption Of Reliance And Grants Motion For Class Certification For Third Time
jdsupra.com
- Second Circuit Decertifies Class In Long-Running Putative Class Action, Holding That Defendants Rebutted Presumption Of Reliancejdsupra.com
- Second Circuit Vacates Class Certification Order And Reaffirms Standard For Defendants To Rebut The Basic Presumption Of Reliancejdsupra.com
- Second Circuit Confirms Ability of Defendants to Challenge and Defeat Class Certification Even After Loss in Jury Trialjdsupra.com
- Second Circuit Holds That Price Impact Can Be Established For Class Certification Based On "Inflation Maintenance" Theory Even Where Inflation Is Not "Fraud-Induced," And Affirms, In a Split Panel, District Court's Determination That Defendants Failed To Rebut The Basic Presumption Of Reliancejdsupra.com
- Supreme Court to Weigh in on Presumption of Reliance in Securities Class Actions: Goldman Sachs v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement Systemjdsupra.com
- Second Circuit Panel Rejects Attempt to Narrow Inflation-Maintenance Securities Fraud Theory; Splits on Decision to Affirm Shareholder Class Certification on Rebutting Basic Presumptionjdsupra.com
- Court Denies Class Certification In Putative Class Action Against Fiber Optic Technology Company Where Defendants Successfully Rebutted Presumption Of Reliance By Showing No Statistically Significant Price Impactjdsupra.com
- Supreme Court To Examine the Presumption of Classwide Reliancejdsupra.com
- Eighth Circuit Reverses District Court for Ignoring Price-Impact Evidence That Rebutted the Fraud-on-the-Market Presumption and Defeated Class Certificationjdsupra.com
- Second Circuit Reiterates: Defendants Must Satisfy Burden Of Persuasion Through A Preponderance Of The Evidence To Rebut Basic Presumption In Securities Fraud Class Actionsjdsupra.com
- After Adopting the “Fraud-on-the-Market” Presumption of Reliance, Australia is Poised to Become a Plaintiff-Friendly Venuejdsupra.com
- District Of New Jersey Finds Defendants Failed To Rebut Fraud-On-The-Market Presumption And Certifies Class Action Against Pharmaceutical Company For Alleged False Statementsjdsupra.com
- It Settled—Now What? Ninth Circuit Limits Settling Plaintiffs’ Ability to Appeal Orders Denying Class Certificationjdsupra.com
- Supreme Court Vacates Class Certification in Goldman Suitjdsupra.com
- Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System: Supreme Court Vacates Class Certification Order in Decade-Long Class Action, Clarifying That Courts May Consider the Materiality of Alleged Misstatements in Applying Fraud-on-the-Market Presumptionjdsupra.com
- RDefendants no longer afforded a presumption of innocencerssfeeds.cincinnati.com
- 2nd Circuit Reinforces Standard of Proof to Rebut Class Certificationjdsupra.com
- Southern District Of Ohio Holds Defendants Cannot Challenge The Manner In Which Shares Were Purchased At The Class Certification Stage And Endorses Price Maintenancejdsupra.com