Newstral
Article
jdsupra.com on 2022-08-08 19:23
California Supreme Court Holds In 5-2 Decision, Over Chief Justice’s Strong Dissent, That Federal Power Act Does Not Fully Preempt CEQA’s Application to FERC’s Licensing Process for State-Owned and Operated Hydroelectric Projects
Related news
- State Courts Lack Jurisdiction Over CEQA Challenge To Matters Within FERC’s Jurisdiction In Hydroelectric Dam Relicensure Process For Oroville Dam Facilitiesjdsupra.com
- eLibrary is Now FERC’s Official Document Repositoryjdsupra.com
- Transgender Californians aim to preempt ballot struggleThe Fresno Bee
- Will Regulation "Best Interest" Preempt State Law?jdsupra.com
- California Supreme Court Reinforces CEQA’s Definition of a Projectjdsupra.com
- OSW’s Loss of Capacity Payments Under FERC’s Recent PJM Orderjdsupra.com
- Once depleted, Lake Oroville restarts hydroelectric power plantsandiegouniontribune.com
- Significant Changes to FERC’s Rules for Market-Based Rate Sellersjdsupra.com
- Hydroelectric potential seen in centuries-old mineThe Salt Lake Tribune
- To Preempt or Not to Preempt - Courts Issue Competing SLUSA Rulingsjdsupra.com
- FERC’s 2020 Enforcement Report Shows Fewer Investigations Opened, Resolvedjdsupra.com
- Will California's drought affect hydroelectric power? (+video)csmonitor.com
- FERC’s Inaction Frustrates Opportunities For Offshore Wind In New Englandjdsupra.com
- Greenhouse Gas Quantification Under FERC’s Pipeline Certification Processjdsupra.com
- Hydroelectric power officials bemoan federal regulationsMerced Sun-Star
- Will California's drought affect hydroelectric power?csmonitor.com
- CQuestions, concerns arise over proposed hydroelectric plantcvrnews.com
- Ninth Circuit: NBA Doesn’t Preempt California Escrow Lawjdsupra.com