Article

jdsupra.com on 2023-10-04 21:18

Supreme Court Case Will Clarify Constitutionality of Permit Exaction Fees

Summary - The Supreme Court of the United States announced that it will hear a Takings Clause case under the Fifth Amendment that will ...

George Sheetz

Related news

U.S. Supreme Court Will Clarify the Constitutionality of Legislatively-Authorized Land Use Exaction Fees jdsupra.com
Matkins , Tigard , California , Placerville , United States
Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Case Challenging CFPB Constitutionality jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Impact Fees at the Supreme Court: How Far Must Government Go to Justify the Fees on a Case-by-Case Basis?jdsupra.com
Washington , Johns River , Oregon , Tigard , California
Supreme Court case about impact fees could have huge consequences for California housing ocregister.com
Lower Manhattan , New York , Ventura , Fremont , San Francisco
What the Sheetz: Where California Development Impact Fees Stand Following Recent Supreme Court Decision jdsupra.com
Johns River , Culver City , San Francisco , San Remo , Tigard
Supreme Court Upholds The Constitutionality of Public Sector Union “Fair Share Fees”jdsupra.com
California , Illinois
Supreme Court to Decide Constitutionality of U.S. Trustee Fees in Chapter 11 Cases jdsupra.com
North Carolina , Alabama , United States
Supreme Court to Decide Constitutionality of Public Section Union “Fair Share Fees”jdsupra.com
Florida , Illinois , California
California Supreme Court Sides with Coastal Commission in Case Challenging Permit Conditions - Ruling Holds That Property Owners Forfeit Challenge to Land Use Permit Conditions by Proceeding with Construction jdsupra.com
Pacific Ocean , Encinitas , California , Manage
Supreme Court Rules Legislative Permit Conditions Not Exempt From Nollan/Dolan Scrutiny jdsupra.com
Tigard , California
Sheetz v. County of El Dorado: The Supreme Court's Latest Restraint on Development Fees jdsupra.com
Washington , Washington , Johns River , Tigard , El Dorado
U.S. Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Property Owner in Exaction Takings Case jdsupra.com
Johns River , Tigard , California , The Bottom
Supreme Court Considers Whether to Expand Constitutional Takings to Legislative Development Fees jdsupra.com
Cedar Point , Nashville , Tigard , California
Lacking Scalia, Supreme Court upholds union fees in California case kansascity.com
Michigan , Fresno , San Luis Obispo , Orange , California
Supreme Court to hear case on public sector union fees POLITICO
Americas , California
Supreme Court agrees to hear case challenging California union fees columbiadailyherald.com
Washington , Orange , California
Union members protest Supreme Court case on nonunion fees dailybruin.com
California
Supreme Court to hear case over mandatory union fees pressherald.com
Wisconsin , Saginaw , Detroit , Orange , Illinois
U.S. Supreme Court: Takings Clause Applies to Impact Fees on New Development jdsupra.com
Tigard , Colorado , Nevada , Arizona , California
U.S. Supreme Court Rules That Legislatively-imposed Permit Conditions Must Satisfy the ‘Essential Nexus’ and ‘Rough Proportionality’ Tests for Takings jdsupra.com
California , Tigard