Newstral
Article
The New York Times on 2023-11-07 19:24
Nature Retracts Room-Temperature Superconductor Discovery
Related news
- Nature retracts a second high-temperature superconductor studyArs Technica
- LK-99: the room-temperature superconductor discovery causing a stirtheweek.co.uk
- Room-temperature superconductor works at lower pressuresArs Technica
- Scientists create the world's first room temperature superconductornewatlas.com
- Room-Temperature Superconductor Discovery Is RetractedThe New York Times
- A Room-Temperature Superconductor Discovery Aims to Overcome ResistanceThe New York Times
- Journal retracts controversial paper on superconductor researchreviewjournal.com
- First room-temperature superconductor reportedArs Technica
- The room-temperature superconductor that wasn’tArs Technica
- QScientists Discover the First Room-Temperature Superconductorquantamagazine.org
- New Room-Temperature Superconductor Discovered by ScientistsThe New York Times
- Replication of high-temperature superconductor comes up emptyArs Technica
- US team retracts bombshell superconductor study after Chinese researchers challenge findingsSouth China Morning Post
- Global Team of Researchers Debunks Claim of Room-Temperature Superconductorbreitbart.com
- Why a “room-temperature superconductor” would be a huge dealvox.com
- Explainer: Have scientists really found a room-temperature superconductor?The Economist
- What’s going on with the reports of a room-temperature superconductor?Ars Technica
- Chinese-led research team raises doubts about US ‘room temperature’ superconductorSouth China Morning Post
- "Reddmatter" shows evidence of room temperature superconductivitynewatlas.com
- LK-99 May Not Be a Room-Temperature Superconductor, but What if It Were?The New York Times