DeutschNewstral
Article
jdsupra.com on 2024-02-16 17:49
Old Habits Die Hard: First Circuit Cites Newly Amended Language of FRE 702 But Follows Abrogated Precedent Instead
Related news
- Amended FRE 702 on Expert Testimony Effective December 1, 2023jdsupra.com
- The New Daubert Standard: Implications of Amended FRE 702jdsupra.com
- The Amended FRE 702: No Charlatans on the Standjdsupra.com
- Science Should Lead the Law: Amending FRE 702 to Let Science Guide Legal Outcomesjdsupra.com
- Amended FRE 702 Arrives in MDL Practice: S.D.N.Y. Excludes Plaintiffs’ Experts in Acetaminophen MDLjdsupra.com
- Proposed Amended FRE 702 Confirms Court as Gatekeeper of Expert Testimonyjdsupra.com
- Acetaminophen MDL: Judge Excludes All of Plaintiffs’ Causation Experts Pursuant to Newly-Amended FRE Rule 702jdsupra.com
- Something to Celebrate: A Brief Guide to the FRE 702 Amendmentsjdsupra.com
- Ninth Circuit panel follows circuit precedent on TCPA autodialer definition but concurring judge takes issue with precedentjdsupra.com
- Seventh Circuit Follows Illinois Supreme Court Precedent And Finds BIPA Claims Timelyjdsupra.com
- Court Follows Fifth Circuit Precedent in Enforcing Unsigned Insurance Arbitration Agreement Under New York Conventionjdsupra.com
- The Rule 702 Toolbox: Proposed Amendments Seek to Reset the Application of FRE 702jdsupra.com
- Upcoming FRE 702 Amendment Reemphasizes the Admissibility Bar for Expert Testimony and Courts’ Gatekeeping Rolejdsupra.com
- Shingles, Vaccines, and Rule 702jdsupra.com
A Precedent for Ginsburgnysun.com
Muslim-registry precedent citednwaonline.com
Coronavirus and Legal Precedentslate.com
A Court Without PrecedentThe Atlantic- LLiberia: “Very Bad Precedent”liberianobserver.com
- From Bystander to Referee: The More Robust Role of Judges Under Amended Federal Rule of Evidence 702jdsupra.com