Article

jdsupra.com on 2024-04-18 18:25

U.S. Supreme Court: Takings Clause Applies to Impact Fees on New Development

The Sheetz v. County of El Dorado decision will create uncertainty in California, Arizona, Nevada, Colorado and many other states as cities, counties, ...

Related news

SCOTUS Moves On Sheetz: Development Impact Fees Imposed By Legislation Must Pass Takings Scrutiny jdsupra.com
El Dorado , California , Eldorado
Supreme Court Considers Whether to Expand Constitutional Takings to Legislative Development Fees jdsupra.com
Cedar Point , Nashville , Tigard , California
Supreme Court Concludes the Takings Clause Applies to Legislative Fee Enactments jdsupra.com
El Dorado , Tigard , Eldorado , California
Are Legislatively Enacted Development Impact Fees on the Chopping Block?jdsupra.com
Flower Mound , California , Tigard
SCOTUS Rules for Landowner in Fifth Amendment Takings Clause Case jdsupra.com
Tigard , California
What the Sheetz: Where California Development Impact Fees Stand Following Recent Supreme Court Decision jdsupra.com
Johns River , Culver City , San Francisco , San Remo , Tigard
Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, California Could be Game Changer for Development Impact Fees jdsupra.com
Johns River , Tigard , California
Builders may challenge California’s development ‘impact fees,’ Supreme Court rules LA Times
El Dorado , Sacramento , Placerville , Ventura , California
Supreme Court Sets Stage for Widespread Challenges to Real Estate Development Impact Fees jdsupra.com
California
Court Holds That County’s Traffic Mitigation Fee Was Valid Under the California Mitigation Fee Act and Did Not Violate the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment jdsupra.com
Johns River , Tigard , Placerville , California
U.S. Supreme Court: Legislative Impact Fees Can Be Unconstitutional Exactions Too jdsupra.com
Tigard , California
Court Rejects Takings Challenge to City’s Imposition of $600,000 in Fees for 11-Unit Infill Project jdsupra.com
Atlanta , Georgia , California , West Hollywood
HSupreme Court Limits Rights of Property Owners Under Takings Clause hamodia.com
Troy , Wisconsin , Washington
Sheetz v. County of El Dorado: The Supreme Court's Latest Restraint on Development Fees jdsupra.com
Washington , Washington , Johns River , Tigard , El Dorado
U.S. Supreme Court Establishes New Test for Evaluating Property Rights Under the Takings Clause jdsupra.com
United States , Arizona , Alaska , Nevada , California
Lot Lines: Development impact fees journalrecord.com
Yukon Territory , Midwest City , Oklahoma City , Oklahoma
Supreme Court case about impact fees could have huge consequences for California housing ocregister.com
Lower Manhattan , New York , Ventura , Fremont , San Francisco
SVons development impact smdp.com
California , Déli , Beach Cities , Nepal , Tibet
SBeach Parking Impact Fees Update sanclementetimes.com
California , The Beach , San Clemente
TAn opinion regarding Impact Fees thecreole.com
California , Florida , Louisiana , Ascension Parish , East Baton Rouge Parish