Newstral
Article
jdsupra.com on 2024-04-23 18:45
Under New York Law, Trade Secret Damages Must Reflect Plaintiff’s Actual Loss, Not Just Defendant’s Wrongful Gain
Related news
- Unfair Competition and Trade Secrets Damages Limited to Plaintiff’s Losses Under New York Lawjdsupra.com
- Hauser v. Fort Hudson Nursing Ctr., Inc.: Expanding Plaintiff’s Right to Damagesjdsupra.com
- Judge Andrews Denies Both Plaintiff And Defendant’s JMOL Motions And Plaintiff’s Motion For New Trial On Damages Following Jury Verdict In Infringement Actionjdsupra.com
- The First Department’s Rejection of Spoliation Sanctions For Pre-IME Surgeries Jeopardizes Plaintiff’s Duty to Mitigate Damagesjdsupra.com
- Automotive Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment Fails as Issues of Fact Remain on Causation and Punitive Damagesjdsupra.com
- New York State Legislature Passes Bill That Will Expand Wrongful Death Damagesjdsupra.com
- Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Shipbuilding Defendant’s Corporate Representative Deposition Deniedjdsupra.com
- New York governor vetoes change to wrongful death statute, nixing damages for emotional sufferingSeattle Times
- Queer Art Workers Reflect: Raja Feather Kelly Wants Sustainability to Become “Actual Practice”hyperallergic.com
- New York’s High Court Takes Fresh Approach to Wrongful Dissolution, Sustains Valuation Discounts, Limits Damages in Partnership Casejdsupra.com
- Decision Provides Insight on New York State Law Regarding Scope of Damages for Wrongful Death of Childrenjdsupra.com
- Court Disagrees with Plaintiff’s Contentions that Defendant’s TAR Process is Defective: eDiscovery Case Lawjdsupra.com
- Court Denies Plaintiff’s Request for Sanctions for Defendant’s Failure to Preserve Surveillance Video: eDiscovery Case Lawjdsupra.com
- Court Denies Plaintiff’s Request for Defendant’s Source Code Production: eDiscovery Case Lawjdsupra.com
- Does this Ring a Bell? Court Orders Plaintiff’s Quick Peek Over Defendant’s Objections: eDiscovery Case Lawjdsupra.com
- Judge Andrews Denies Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff’s Allegations Of Direct Infringementjdsupra.com
- Defendant’s motion to quash plaintiff’s requests for admission of fact in maritime case grantedjdsupra.com
- Plaintiff’s Expert Precluded under Rule 702, Talc Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment Grantedjdsupra.com
- Judge Noreika Denies Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint Alleging Direct Infringement Of Asserted Patentsjdsupra.com
- Court Denies Defendant’s Motion to Overrule Plaintiff’s Objections to Discovery Requests: eDiscovery Case Lawjdsupra.com